Please note the CAPITALISATION should not be seen as shouting, but is simply being used to highlight the LEGAL ILLUSION.
If you never make a STATEMENT or SIGN anything given to you by a TV LINCENSING ENFORCEMENT OFFICERthere is nothing they can do; print and give this to them and have fun!!
No doubt in the future this will change as we are telling people how thier CORRUPT SYSTEM of DECEPTION works.
When you make a STATEMENT you are entering into CONTRACT with TV LICENSING which seems to be this
COMPANY found on Dunn & Bradstreet. So who are CONSIGNIA (CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT) LTD also traded asTV LICENSING?
That CONTRACT is worth up to £1000.00 under the COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003 plus COURT (COMPANY) COSTS being ENFORCED by a PRIVATE COMPANY??
As in any process where you have to fill in and SIGN a STATEMENT of EVIDENCE you are simply being DECEIVED for this is nothing more than a CONTRACT.
As you can see from the slide INCLUSION of one is the EXCLUSION of another – maxim
This simply means whatever is wrote after the word INCLUDE(S) is all it INCLUDES nothing else, everything and anything else, is EXCLUDED
The example above from TV LICENSING clearly shows that all they will have against you is a STATEMENT given by you, which you would SIGN to say you UNDERSTAND, which would contain your NAME, ADDRESS, DATE of BIRTH and your SIGNATURE.
“which MAY INCLUDE” in LEGALESE would actually read “which MUST be” because of the above maxim they have to get you to make a STATEMENT, because they say something they have no way of doing; How can they possibly provide a COURT EVIDENCE you own a TV?
MUST is synonymous with MAY; in this example the word MAY would be replaced for the word MUST because MAYis followed by INCLUDE which inturn would become be; “MUST BE”
The only EVIDENCE they would have is when you ADMIT to watching or OWNING a TV in your own STATEMENT, because you cant watch something you don’t have! But this is not EVIDENCE, it’s DECEPTION for it is simply a CONTRACT!
This STATEMENT (CONTRACT) would CONTAIN the NAME and ADDRESS of the LEGAL PERSONALITY they are trying to ACT (CONTRACT) upon and a SIGNATURE from a Man or Woman to say “I UNDERSTAND” and I will now REPRESENT that LEGAL PERSONALITY (a PIECE of PAPER) and CONSENT to the CONTRACT (ACT).
UNDERSTAND is synonymous with STAND-UNDER; this is how they gain AUTHORITY over you (CONSENT), this can be done by IN-ACTion (ACTually saying I UNDERSTAND) or simply by ACTion; SIGNING a SIGNATUREmeans you UNDERSTAND (STAND-UNDER)(CONSENT).
Please allow me to explain:
It is a LEGAL REQUIREMENT that you UNDERSTAND (STAND-UNDER)(CONSENT), but not that you ACTually UNDERSTAND
These people cannot FORCE you to make a STATEMENT nor can they FORCE you to SIGN anything, so if you REFUSE to do this there is nothing they can do and they have no CONTRACT (EVIDENCE).
Nothing can exist in the LEGAL world unless it has LEGAL PERSONALITY, a PIECE of PAPER to say it exists, all the LEGAL world can ACT (CONTRACT) upon is that PIECE of PAPER, but because it is STATIONARY (MOTIONLESS), they need a Man or Woman to REPRESENT the STATIONARY PIECE of PAPER to give itMOTION, because a PIECE of PAPER can’t talk, walk or pick up a pen.
Because the LEGAL world can only ACT (CONTRACT) upon LEGAL PERSONALITIES (PIECES of PAPER) they need the Man or Woman to REPRESENT a BIRTH CERTIFICATE, LEGAL PERSONALITY, a PIECE of PAPER.
To do this they first must get JOINDER, this is why you are asked for your full NAME (as on your BIRTH CERTIFICATE), ADDRESS and DATE of BIRTH. Giving this information allows them to create JOINDER to a LEGAL PERSONALITY (a PIECE of PAPER) and you are duped into believing you are this LEGAL PERSONALITY, something you are falsely identifing with.
In the process of you SIGNING you are simply saying I UNDERSTAND (STAND-UNDER)(CONSENT) and IAGREE to REPRESENT that LEGAL PERSONALITY (a PIECE of PAPER). Your STATEMENT is nothing more than a CONTRACT that you unwittingly enter into via simple DECEPTION.
Then as the REPRESENTATIVE of this LEGAL PERSONALITY (PIECE of PAPER) You would then go to a COURT(COMPANY) that is a TRADING NAME of a COMPANY called the MINISTRY of JUSTICE for SUMMARYJUDGEMENT, for as far as they are concerned the CONTRACT is already ESTABLISHED to aLEGAL PERSONALITY, by your own STATEMENT (CONTRACT) and you (the Man or Woman) have CONSENTEDto REPRESENT the LEGAL PERSONALITY (PIECE of PAPER) the ACT (CONTRACT) ACTually APPLIES to.
They are not called ACT’s of PARLIAMENT by mistake!! To ACT-on (CONTRACT with) a LEGAL PERSONALITY(PIECE of PAPER) there needs to be MOTION (from a Man or Woman) otherwise everything just stays STATIONARY (ACTion-less)
Basically if you are PAYING for a TV LICENSE from this PRIVATE COMPANY you are being DECEIVED and if you REFUSE to PAY they will use a STATEMENT (CONTRACT) so you can PUNISH yourself by your own ACTions. Without DECEIVING you into this, there is nothing they can do and this is quite EVIDENT by their own DOCUMENTATION.
The slides below show images of the Dunn & Bradstreet COMPANY search results on the MINISTRY of JUSTICEand the report we purchased on this COMPANY.
The slides and images are from my new updated version of the presentation “it’s an illusion” and It is simply an illusion, that only works via DECEPTION, exactly what an illusion is.
(Footnote) I must say thanks to Darren for the information regarding the word INCLUDE(S)!! And also I would like to apologise if the above seems complicated, this is the main reason I do the talks, as this is far easier to explain when I talk about it, rather than try to write it down. I have been asked at many talks to get this info on the site for people to read, I am trying! Much love to all – john